Miller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Miller v. State

1923 OK CR 149, 215 P. 1118, 24 Okla. Crim. 26, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 261

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Okla. Crim. 103 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 9, 1923·No. No. A-4541.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Floyd Miller, convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on an information charging the maintaining of a liquor nuisance, was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for six months and to pay a’ fine of $500 and the costs. From the judgment rendered on the 15th day of September, 1922, an appeal was perfected, by filing in' this court a petition in error with case-made. The plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, has filed a motion to dismiss his said appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause dismissed, and remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Floyd Miller, convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on an information charging the maintaining of a liquor nuisance, was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for six months and to pay a’ fine of $500 and the costs. From the judgment rendered on the 15th day of September, 1922, an appeal was perfected, by filing in' this court a petition in error with case-made. The plaintiff in error, by his counsel of record, has filed a motion to dismiss his said appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause dismissed, and remanded to the county court of Oklahoma county. Mandate forthwith.

Miller v. State, 1923 OK CR 149, 215 P. 1118, 24 Okla. Crim. 26, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 261 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

1923 OK CR 149 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.