Miller v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Miller v. State

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 6, 1920

DocketNo. 16590

StatusPublished

This text of 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535 (Ohio 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed on authority of State of Ohio v. Davis, 90 Ohio St., 100, proposition 3 of the syllabus, and Baxter v. State of Ohio, 91 Ohio St., 167, proposition 3 of the syllabus; and it not being necessary so to do, the court considers in this case no other assignment of error.

And this court proceeding now to render the judgment that the .court of appeals should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the [536]*536judgments of the court of common pleas and the municipal court of Cincinnati be, and the same hereby are, reversed, and this cause is remanded to the said municipal court' for further proceedihgs according to law.

Judgments reversed and cause remanded.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Avery, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed on authority of State of Ohio v. Davis, 90 Ohio St., 100, proposition 3 of the syllabus, and Baxter v. State of Ohio, 91 Ohio St., 167, proposition 3 of the syllabus; and it not being necessary so to do, the court considers in this case no other assignment of error.

And this court proceeding now to render the judgment that the .court of appeals should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that the [536]*536judgments of the court of common pleas and the municipal court of Cincinnati be, and the same hereby are, reversed, and this cause is remanded to the said municipal court' for further proceedihgs according to law.

Judgments reversed and cause remanded.

Nichols, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Johnson, Wanamaker, Robinson and Avery, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

101 Ohio St. (N.S.) 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-ohio-1920.