Miller v. State

5 Ohio St. 275
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

J. R. Swan, J.

In a trial upon an information under the fourth section of the “ act to provide against the evils resulting from the sale of intoxicating liquors in the State of Ohio,” proof was given that a sale was made to a person in the habit of getting intoxicated, but under circumstances tending to show that the liquor was obtained under false pretenses, etc.

Held: That it is error to charge the jury that if the defendant was induced to sell the liquor to such person under an imposition practiced upon the defendant, so that the defendant had no intention to violate the law, he must, notwithstanding, be held to have sold to such person, at his peril, and must be deemed guilty under the statute.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 5 Ohio St. 275 (Ohio 1855).

5 Ohio St. 275 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. State
1 Ohio N.P. 241 (Summit County Court of Common Pleas, 1895)
Falk
42 Ohio St. (N.S.) 638 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1885)
Granger v. Knipper
2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 480 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1873)