Miller v. State
23 A.D.2d 950, 260 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 28, 1965·No. Claim No. 37547·Published
Opinion
Memorandum by the Court. While we do not accept the trial court’s theory (see City of Buffalo v. Pratt, 131 N. Y. 293; Matter of City of New York [Northern Blvd.], 258 N. Y. 136,152) there is no proof in this record of consequential damages and any finding of damage accruing after the expira[951]*951tian of the 17-year lease woidd have to be purely conjectural. We decide no other issue. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 23 A.D.2d 950, 260 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).
23 A.D.2d 950 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Buffalo v. . Pratt
30 N.E. 233 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.)
179 N.E. 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)