Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Miller v. State

Miller v. State

23 A.D.2d 950, 260 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 28, 1965
DocketClaim No. 37547
StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 950 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. State, 23 A.D.2d 950, 260 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. While we do not accept the trial court’s theory (see City of Buffalo v. Pratt, 131 N. Y. 293; Matter of City of New York [Northern Blvd.], 258 N. Y. 136,152) there is no proof in this record of consequential damages and any finding of damage accruing after the expira[951]*951tian of the 17-year lease woidd have to be purely conjectural. We decide no other issue. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Buffalo v. . Pratt
30 N.E. 233 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)
Matter of City of N.Y. (Northern Blvd.)
179 N.E. 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 A.D.2d 950, 260 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-nyappdiv-1965.