Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. State

576 S.W.3d 618

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 18, 2019·No. WD 81481·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Miller claims the judgment of convictions for burglary in the first degree and violation of an order of protection put him in jeopardy twice for the same crime. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Miller claims the judgment of convictions for burglary in the first degree and violation of an order of protection put him in jeopardy twice for the same crime. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Miller v. State, 576 S.W.3d 618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

576 S.W.3d 618 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.