Miller v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Miller v. State

576 S.W.3d 618

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 18, 2019

DocketWD 81481

StatusPublished

This text of 576 S.W.3d 618 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 576 S.W.3d 618 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Miller claims the judgment of convictions for burglary in the first degree and violation of an order of protection put him in jeopardy twice for the same crime. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joshua Miller appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Miller claims the judgment of convictions for burglary in the first degree and violation of an order of protection put him in jeopardy twice for the same crime. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

576 S.W.3d 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-moctapp-2019.