Miller v. State
863 S.W.2d 380, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 1993 WL 327141
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 74 →
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Dwayne Miller, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the motion court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties here involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 863 S.W.2d 380, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 1993 WL 327141 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
863 S.W.2d 380 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.