Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Miller v. State

138 So. 3d 634, 2014 WL 1814024, 2014 La. LEXIS 1060

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 25, 2014

DocketNo. 2013-KH-2230

StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 3d 634 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 138 So. 3d 634, 2014 WL 1814024, 2014 La. LEXIS 1060 (La. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Miller, Dale Robin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 01-92141; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW12-00593.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. If it has not already done so, the district attorney is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, § 3; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:31.1; State ex rel. Robinson v. State, 12-2562 [635]*635(La.4/19/13), 111 So.3d 1023; State ex rel. Jacobs v. State, 11-1956 (La.4/27/12), 85 So.3d 1280; State ex rel. Barbee v. State, 10-0275 (La.2/4/11), 57 So.3d 318; State ex rel. Level v. State, 99-2266 (La.12/17/99), 751 So.2d 869; State ex rel. Leonard v. State, 96-1889 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 1325; Range v. Moreau, 96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Miller, Dale Robin; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. K, No. 01-92141; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW12-00593.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. If it has not already done so, the district attorney is ordered to provide relator with an estimate of the costs of reproducing public records relator has requested and to which relator is entitled. La. Const, art. XII, § 3; R.S. 44:31; R.S. 44:31.1; State ex rel. Robinson v. State, 12-2562 [635]*635(La.4/19/13), 111 So.3d 1023; State ex rel. Jacobs v. State, 11-1956 (La.4/27/12), 85 So.3d 1280; State ex rel. Barbee v. State, 10-0275 (La.2/4/11), 57 So.3d 318; State ex rel. Level v. State, 99-2266 (La.12/17/99), 751 So.2d 869; State ex rel. Leonard v. State, 96-1889 (La.6/13/97), 695 So.2d 1325; Range v. Moreau, 96-1607 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 537. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 So. 3d 634, 2014 WL 1814024, 2014 La. LEXIS 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-la-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack