Miller v. State

131 S.E. 304, 34 Ga. App. 778, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 23
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 12, 1926
Docket16941
StatusPublished

This text of 131 S.E. 304 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. State, 131 S.E. 304, 34 Ga. App. 778, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 23 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial based on the general grounds only was properly overruled, as the verdict was supported by evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., a/nd Luke, J., eoneur. Beall & Beall, fpr plaintiff in error. Emmett Smith, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 S.E. 304, 34 Ga. App. 778, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-gactapp-1926.