Miller v. State
101 S.E. 197, 24 Ga. App. 354, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 652
Opinion
1. In the light of the note of the trial judge, tliex’e is no merit in the 9th special gx-ound of the motion for a new trial.
2. The vei'dict was demanded by the evidence and the statement of the defendant; and therefore, if there were any errors in the charge of the court, they were harmless.
3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 101 S.E. 197, 24 Ga. App. 354, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 652 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
101 S.E. 197 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cauley v. State
203 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Pennington v. State
161 S.E.2d 327 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)