Miller v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Miller v. State

77 S.E. 653, 12 Ga. App. 479, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 593

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 18, 1913

Docket4340

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 653 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 77 S.E. 653, 12 Ga. App. 479, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 593 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

It appears, from the evidence, that the accused was a wages hand, employed as a farm laborer, whose, duty was to work on any part of the employer’s plantation where he was directed to labor, and that he was required to eat his meals at the employer’s residence on the plantation; and the evidence does not disclose that he carried the pistol at any other place than the part of the plantation between his employer’s residence and the house occupied by himself and' his wife, which also was upon the plantation. Held, that, under these facts, the house' of the employer and the space between it and,the house occupied by the accused upon the plantation are included, as to the accused, in the term “place of business/’ within the meaning of the act of 1910 as to carrying a pistol without a license (Acts 1910,. p. 134). Coker v. State, ante, 425 (76 S. E. 103, 991). Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

It appears, from the evidence, that the accused was a wages hand, employed as a farm laborer, whose, duty was to work on any part of the employer’s plantation where he was directed to labor, and that he was required to eat his meals at the employer’s residence on the plantation; and the evidence does not disclose that he carried the pistol at any other place than the part of the plantation between his employer’s residence and the house occupied by himself and' his wife, which also was upon the plantation. Held, that, under these facts, the house' of the employer and the space between it and,the house occupied by the accused upon the plantation are included, as to the accused, in the term “place of business/’ within the meaning of the act of 1910 as to carrying a pistol without a license (Acts 1910,. p. 134). Coker v. State, ante, 425 (76 S. E. 103, 991). Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 S.E. 653, 12 Ga. App. 479, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-gactapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack