Miller v. State
61 S.E. 494, 4 Ga. App. 392, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 309
Opinion
This case is controlled by the decision of this court in Jacobs v. State, 1 Ga. App. 519 (1), (57 S. E. 1063). A conviction for vagrancy is unauthorized where testimony that at certain times the defendant was seen not to work is opposed by positive and unimpeached testimony that he worked, especially where the evidence for the State wholly fails to show that he did not have visible means of support.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 61 S.E. 494, 4 Ga. App. 392, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 309 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
61 S.E. 494 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farley v. State
237 S.W. 281 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Leonard v. State
63 S.E. 530 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)