Miller v. State
This text of 263 S.E.2d 441 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This habeas corpus was filed to contest an extradition on the ground that Miller was not in the demanding state (Missouri) at the time of the alleged offense. Miller’s attorney has filed an Anders motion to this appeal because his defense no longer is viable after Michigan v. Doran, — U. S. — (99 SC 530, 58 LE2d 521) (1978). Smith v. Hart, 243 Ga. 59 (252 SE2d 470) (1979); Frazier v. Rutledge, 243 Ga. 39 (252 SE2d 465) (1979). We have reviewed the record on appeal and both affirm the denial of habeas relief and deny counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 S.E.2d 441, 245 Ga. 137, 1980 Ga. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-ga-1980.