Miller v. State

106 So. 3d 510, 2013 WL 375175, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 2013·No. No. 5D12-1661·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the lower court’s order removing a court-ordered lien on his inmate trust account but denying his request for reimbursement of funds used from the account to pay court costs and fines. The State properly concedes error. See Wilcox v. State, 79 So.3d 878, 878-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (holding that no statutory basis exists to impose lien on inmate trust account for court costs and fines); Araujo-Espichan v. State, 62 So.3d 683, 684 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (reversing judgment that improperly placed lien on inmate’s account and instructing lower court to reimburse funds removed from account).

Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND, with instructions that the State be ordered to reimburse Appellant for the $883 improperly removed from his account pursuant to the lien order.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 106 So. 3d 510, 2013 WL 375175, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1532 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

106 So. 3d 510 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ARAUJO-ESPICHAN v. State
62 So. 3d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Wilcox v. State
79 So. 3d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)