Miller v. State

103 So. 3d 226, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20785, 2012 WL 6027752
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2012·No. No. 3D12-2578·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal from a summary denial, this Court must reverse unless the post-conviction record, see Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(A), shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Because the record now before us fails to make the required showing, we reverse the order and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again enters an order summarily denying the post-conviction motion, the court shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the appellant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 103 So. 3d 226, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20785, 2012 WL 6027752 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

103 So. 3d 226 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.