Miller v. State

820 So. 2d 1056, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9683, 2002 WL 1466589
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 764 So. 2d 640
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2002·No. No. 4D00-4672·Published

Opinion

FARMER, J.

We reject defendant’s Apprendi challenge to his 10-year sentence for lewd and lascivious battery.1 Under the statutes the maximum sentence for this offense is 15 years.2 Thus the addition of points for penetration did not increase the sentence beyond the prescribed maximum. In this circumstance, the points relate to a legitimate sentencing factor. We thus follow our decision in Gilson v. State, 795 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), involving the same issue under identical circumstances. In so doing we express no opinion as to the result that would obtain where sentencing points push the sentence beyond the statutory maximum.3

AFFIRMED.

HAZOURI, J, and DELL, JOHN W., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 820 So. 2d 1056, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9683, 2002 WL 1466589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 1056 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
Gilson v. State
795 So. 2d 105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)