Miller v. State

239 So. 2d 32
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6077
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 3, 1970·No. No. N-198·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this cause before this court. The first was a direct appeal resulting in affirmance of the judgment of the lower court. Miller v. State, 224 So.2d 455 (Fla.App.1969). This appeal is from the lower court’s denial of appellant’s second motion to vacate under Florida Criminal Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

The briefs and record on appeal have been read and given full consideration. The grounds relied upon by appellant for vacation of the judgment of conviction and sentence for uttering a forgery failing to allege facts which, if true, would constitute a denial of due process of law or of any right which would warrant such relief, the order of the lower court denying the motion is hereby affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 239 So. 2d 32 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

239 So. 2d 32 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. State
224 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)