Miller v. State

22 Fla. Supp. 2d 151
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Fla. Supp. 2d 113
Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida·Decided February 3, 1987·No. Case No. 84-251 AC (County Court Case No. 84-70118)·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before the Court on Appellant’s claim that the lower Court erred in refusing to grant Appellant a jury trial; refusing to find entrapment as a matter of law or fact and that the lower Court erred in the imposition of sentence.

We find the overriding issue being that of whether the Appellant was [152]*152entitled to a jury trial and answer that question in the affirmative, relying on the Florida Supreme Court’s pronouncements in Whirley v. State, 450 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1984) and Reed v. State, 470 So.2d 1382 (Fla. 1985).

It is the finding of this Court that the issue of prostitution is one of moral turpitude and should be resolved in trial by jury.

Having decided that issue, we do not find it necessary to decide the other issues in this case at this time. Consequently, this case is Reversed and Remanded to the lower Court for trial by jury.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 22 Fla. Supp. 2d 151 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1987).

22 Fla. Supp. 2d 151 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reed v. State
470 So. 2d 1382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Whirley v. State
450 So. 2d 836 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)