Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Miller v. State

67 So. 2d 327, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1653

DecidedSeptember 22, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 67 So. 2d 327 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 67 So. 2d 327, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1653 (Fla. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

MATHEWS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of manslaughter. The principal assignment of error is with reference to the actions, conduct and cross-examination of the appellant by the prosecutor. The appellant relies upon the case of Thomas v. State, Fla., 59 So.2d 517, where the case was reversed because of the actions, conduct and cross-examination of the prosecuting attorney. The facts in the case now under consideration are almost analogous to the facts set forth and shown 'by the record in the case of Thomas' v. State, supra.

The Attorney General, with frankness and candor, has filed a brief in this case in which it is stated:

“The State concedes that the judgment below should be reversed on the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla., 59 So.2d 517.”

This case is unusual in that all parties to the proceeding agree that the case should •be reversed and a new trial granted.

Reversed for a new trial upon the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla., 59 So.2d 517.

ROBERTS, C. J., and' TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATHEWS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of manslaughter. The principal assignment of error is with reference to the actions, conduct and cross-examination of the appellant by the prosecutor. The appellant relies upon the case of Thomas v. State, Fla., 59 So.2d 517, where the case was reversed because of the actions, conduct and cross-examination of the prosecuting attorney. The facts in the case now under consideration are almost analogous to the facts set forth and shown 'by the record in the case of Thomas' v. State, supra.

The Attorney General, with frankness and candor, has filed a brief in this case in which it is stated:

“The State concedes that the judgment below should be reversed on the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla., 59 So.2d 517.”

This case is unusual in that all parties to the proceeding agree that the case should •be reversed and a new trial granted.

Reversed for a new trial upon the authority of Thomas v. State, Fla., 59 So.2d 517.

ROBERTS, C. J., and' TERRELL and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 So. 2d 327, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-fla-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack