Miller v. State ex rel. Bonnell
This text of 71 Ind. 601 (Miller v. State ex rel. Bonnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Prosecution for bastardy. Trial, verdict and judgment against the defendant.
The ease is before us on the evidence, the only question being whether it was sufficient to sustain the verdict.
The testimony of the relatrix, taken by itself, was amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. But in some respects she was contradicted. There was much conflict in the evidence. Indeed, it may be said to be doubtful whether the relatrix really knew who was the father of her child. But the case is not one that justifies us in disturbing the verdict.
The judgment below is affirmed, with' costs
Note. — Opinion filed at May term, 1880, but omitted by mistake.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Ind. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-ex-rel-bonnell-ind-1880.