Miller v. State Bank
Opinion
Plaintiff was agent for Simon Clark & Co., and, as such, deposited money of theirs with defendant to the credit of himself, — “A. J. Miller, Agent.” Afterwards Simon Clark & Co. made an assignment in insolvency.
Whether plaintiff could or could not, while his agency continued, maintain -an action in his oavu name on the deposit, he certainly could not after his relation to the deposit ceased by the revocation of his agency with respect to it
[323]*323The assignment of his principals, Simon Clark & Co., worked such revocation.
Order reversed.
(Opinion published 59 N. W. 309.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
59 N.W. 309 (Miller v. State Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.