Miller v. State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Miller v. State Bank

59 N.W. 309, 57 Minn. 319, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 293

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 24, 1894

DocketNo. 8803

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 N.W. 309 (Miller v. State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State Bank, 59 N.W. 309, 57 Minn. 319, 1894 Minn. LEXIS 293 (Mich. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilfillan, C. J.

Plaintiff was agent for Simon Clark & Co., and, as such, deposited money of theirs with defendant to the credit of himself, — “A. J. Miller, Agent.” Afterwards Simon Clark & Co. made an assignment in insolvency.

Whether plaintiff could or could not, while his agency continued, maintain -an action in his oavu name on the deposit, he certainly could not after his relation to the deposit ceased by the revocation of his agency with respect to it

[323]*323The assignment of his principals, Simon Clark & Co., worked such revocation.

Order reversed.

Book, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 59 N. W. 309.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI