Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Miller v. State

934 S.W.2d 532, 326 Ark. 1101, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 709

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedDecember 23, 1996

DocketCR 96-1448

StatusPublished

This text of 934 S.W.2d 532 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 934 S.W.2d 532, 326 Ark. 1101, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 709 (Ark. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Robert Miller, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Darrel Blount, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Robert Miller, by his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Darrel Blount, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

934 S.W.2d 532, 326 Ark. 1101, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-ark-1996.