Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Miller v. State

902 S.W.2d 228, 321 Ark. 358, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 477

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

DocketCR 95-129

StatusPublished

This text of 902 S.W.2d 228 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 902 S.W.2d 228, 321 Ark. 358, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 477 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Alfred James Miller through his counsel, Frank E. Shaw, moves to file a belated brief. The record in this case shows that counsel Shaw moved on February 27, 1995, to be relieved as counsel or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file his brief. The motion to be relieved was denied, and the due date for appellant’s brief was set for March 29, 1995. Appellant tendered his brief approximately two months late on May 26, 1995. Counsel Shaw states in his motion to file a belated brief that it was due on April 28, 1995, and that he did not meet the deadline due to hospitalization and medical infirmities. But, again, the record in the Supreme Court Clerk’s office shows that the brief was due on March 29, 1995.

The motion for belated brief is granted. A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Alfred James Miller through his counsel, Frank E. Shaw, moves to file a belated brief. The record in this case shows that counsel Shaw moved on February 27, 1995, to be relieved as counsel or, in the alternative, for an extension of time to file his brief. The motion to be relieved was denied, and the due date for appellant’s brief was set for March 29, 1995. Appellant tendered his brief approximately two months late on May 26, 1995. Counsel Shaw states in his motion to file a belated brief that it was due on April 28, 1995, and that he did not meet the deadline due to hospitalization and medical infirmities. But, again, the record in the Supreme Court Clerk’s office shows that the brief was due on March 29, 1995.

The motion for belated brief is granted. A copy of this opinion will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

902 S.W.2d 228, 321 Ark. 358, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-ark-1995.