Miller v. State
This text of 658 S.W.2d 389 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, James Miller, d/b/a A Bail Bonds, brings this appeal from an order of the circuit court ordering judgment of $31,050.00 against him for nine bond forfeitures. Appellant contends the trial court erred in holding him personally liable on bonds for which Cotton Belt Insurance Company, placed in receivership in 1982, was the insurer. We agree.
The trial court found that in each case the executing agent was appellant or one authorized by him. In eight of the cases, the defendant failed to appear and a bond forfeiture was declared. In the ninth case, the defendant failed to appear because he was detained in a federal penitentiary. Appellant denies liability on all the cases, contending he acted solely as an agent of Cotton Belt Insurance Company. Liability on the ninth case was also denied pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. § 43-733 which provides no forfeiture be rendered when the principal in the bond is detained under authority of the federal government.
The record reflects the trial court knew appellant was acting for Cotton Belt Insurance Company: “The Court: I think I will stipulate to that. I don’t think Jimmy ever told me he’d be respnsible for it, notwithstanding the fact that there are some contracts otherwise. I think that I always dealt with Jimmy as Cotton Belt.” Here, the stipulation was determinative of the fact that appellant was acting as an agent and not as a surety.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
658 S.W.2d 389, 280 Ark. 371, 1983 Ark. LEXIS 1528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-ark-1983.