Miller v. State
96 So. 718, 19 Ala. App. 229, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 102
Opinion
The indictment in both counts follows the statute, and is sufficient.
We have several times held that the Volstead Act (41 Stat. 305) does not supersede the state laws prohibiting the manufacture of whisky. Mary Banks v. State, 207 Ala. 170, 93 South. 293.
The exceptions reserved to the introduction of evidence are without merit.
, We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. .
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 96 So. 718, 19 Ala. App. 229, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 102 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).
96 So. 718 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hallmark v. State
101 So. 905 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1924)