Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

73 A.3d 523, 621 Pa. 17, 2013 WL 3940792, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 1657
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority. Read the opinion of the Court — 628 Pa. 78
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 31, 2013·No. No. 236 MAL 2013·Published

Opinion

[18]*18 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of July 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. The issue, as stated by petitioners:

Did the Commonwealth Court’s decision conflict with decisions of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court where it affirmed the lower court’s order granting [respondent] SEPTA’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the basis that Congress intended to preempt state law claims of negligent railroad bridge construction and interference with riparian rights when it enacted the Federal Railroad Safety Act?

Petitioner’s Application for Leave to Supplement Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 73 A.3d 523, 621 Pa. 17, 2013 WL 3940792, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 1657 (Pa. 2013).

73 A.3d 523 (Miller v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.