Miller v. . Smith

85 S.E. 379, 169 N.C. 210, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 176
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 24, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 85 S.E. 379 (Miller v. . Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. . Smith, 85 S.E. 379, 169 N.C. 210, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 176 (N.C. 1915).

Opinion

BeowN, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,387.39, with interest thereon from 15 November, 1913, due for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered, and for board of employees, and for goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to employees on orders from time to time from 1 August, 1913, to 1 March, 1914, which sums for board, merchandise, and orders the said defendants contracted and agreed to pay at the prices charged; that there is due on said account, after deducting all credits to which the defendants are entitled, the sum of $1,387.39, with interest from 15 November, 1913. The language of this complaint is plain and unambiguous. It alleges a distinct promise to pay at the prices charged.

Upon all the authorities, the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment by default final upon the failure to answer within the time required by law. Hartman v. Farior, 95 N. C., 177; Witt v. Long, 93 N. C., 388.

In addition, his Honor not only finds facts which fail to show excusable neglect for failure to file the answer, but he also finds that the defendants have no meritorious or valid defense to the cause of action set out in the complaint. Jeffries v. Aaron, 120 N. C., 169.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGuire v. Sammonds
100 S.E.2d 829 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Venn v. . Coleman
174 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. Vance Plumbing & Electric Co.
195 N.C. 629 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Supply Co. v. . Plumbing Co.
143 S.E. 248 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Garner v. . Quakenbush
122 S.E. 474 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Montague v. . Lumpkins
100 S.E. 417 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 379, 169 N.C. 210, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-smith-nc-1915.