Miller v. Smerkins

242 A.D. 659
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Smerkins. Read the opinion of the Court — 243 A.D. 780

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the plaintiff’s proofs are sufficient to show that H. S. Smerkins, Inc., the judgment debtor, was in business at 420 Forty-seventh avenue, Long Island City, in 1933, and that it, and not Smerkins as an individual, sold the business to'the Hesco Waterproof Products Corporation. Findings inconsistent with this decision are reversed. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Smerkins, 242 A.D. 659 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

242 A.D. 659 (Miller v. Smerkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.