Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co.
8 Misc. 2d 1041, 160 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3637
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 24, 1957·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Assuming that there was a violation of an ordinance by the defendant in double parking its truck for the purpose of making a delivery of oil, there was no showing that this violation was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s damage.
The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co., 8 Misc. 2d 1041, 160 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).
8 Misc. 2d 1041 (Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kachuba v. A & G Cleaning Service, Inc.
273 A.D.2d 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Somersall v. New York Telephone Co.
74 A.D.2d 302 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Latham Motors, Inc. v. G. F. Blackmer & Sons, Inc.
56 Misc. 2d 631 (New York County Courts, 1968)