Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co.

8 Misc. 2d 1041, 160 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3637
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1957
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 Misc. 2d 1041 (Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Sinram Marnis Oil Co., 8 Misc. 2d 1041, 160 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Assuming that there was a violation of an ordinance by the defendant in double parking its truck for the purpose of making a delivery of oil, there was no showing that this violation was the proximate cause of plaintiff’s damage.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs.

Hecht, Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kachuba v. A & G Cleaning Service, Inc.
273 A.D.2d 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Somersall v. New York Telephone Co.
74 A.D.2d 302 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Latham Motors, Inc. v. G. F. Blackmer & Sons, Inc.
56 Misc. 2d 631 (New York County Courts, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Misc. 2d 1041, 160 N.Y.S.2d 892, 1957 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-sinram-marnis-oil-co-nyappterm-1957.