Miller v. Shaw

51 A.D.3d 927, 859 N.Y.S.2d 666
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 20, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 51 A.D.3d 927 (Miller v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Shaw, 51 A.D.3d 927, 859 N.Y.S.2d 666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (O’Shea, J.), dated March 26, 2007, which, after a hearing, awarded sole custody of the subject child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court did not err in awarding permanent custody to the father. The determination of the Family Court in a custody dispute is generally accorded great deference on appeal, and should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record, as it is based upon a firsthand assessment of the parties, their credibility, their character, and their temperament (see Matter of Garcia v Perez, 48 AD3d 812 [2008]). There is no basis here to disturb the Family Court’s determination.

To the extent that the mother raises issues regarding the temporary custody order, those issues are academic. The order awarding the father temporary custody of the child was superseded by the order awarding him permanent custody, and the temporary order is no longer of any effect. Any alleged defect [928]*928in the temporary order does not render defective the permanent order, which was based upon a full and fair hearing (see Cucinello v Cucinello, 234 AD2d 365 [1996]). Florio, J.E, Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Saylor v. Bukowski
2019 NY Slip Op 1777 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Kleinbach v. Cullerton
2017 NY Slip Op 4641 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Matter of Julian S. (Patricia L.)
121 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Chamas v. Carino
119 A.D.3d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Haggerty v. Haggerty
78 A.D.3d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Ramirez v. Velez
78 A.D.3d 1062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Drake v. Carroll
73 A.D.3d 1172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Willis B. v. Lourdes A.
61 A.D.3d 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Brenda J. v. Nicole M.
59 A.D.3d 299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Reeves v. Colon
56 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Gilchrest v. Patterson
55 A.D.3d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.3d 927, 859 N.Y.S.2d 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-shaw-nyappdiv-2008.