Miller v. Sharp

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2009
Docket09-6613
StatusUnpublished

This text of Miller v. Sharp (Miller v. Sharp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Sharp, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6613

ALPHONZO J. MILLER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MR. SHARP, Dentist, Dr.,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00050-MSD-TEM)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alphonzo J. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alphonzo J. Miller appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Miller v. Sharp, No. 2:09-cv-00050-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va.

Mar. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miller v. Sharp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-sharp-ca4-2009.