Miller v. Segerblom
This text of Miller v. Segerblom (Miller v. Segerblom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MACK JOSEPH MILLER, IT, No. 85134 Appellant, vs. RICHARD L. "TICK" SEGERBLOM, FILED Respondent. AUG 2 3 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLER6.OF SUPREME COURT BY • Yt DEPUTY CLER ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL,
This appeal was docketed on August 8, 2022, without payment of the requisite filing fee and without the case appeal statement. See NRAP 3(e), (f). That same day, this court issued notices directing appellant to file the case appeal statement and to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 7 days. The notices advised that failure to pay the filing fee would result in the dismissal of this appeal and failure to file the case appeal statement could result in sanctions, including dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the case appeal statement, or otherwise responded to this court's notices. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN
BY:
cc: Hon. Erika D. I3allou, District Judge Law Office of Timothy R. Treffinger SUPREME COURT OF McLetchie Law NEVADA Eighth District Court Clerk CLERK'S ORDER
(0) 1947 Co316
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Miller v. Segerblom, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-segerblom-nev-2022.