Miller v. Securepak
This text of 300 F. App'x 506 (Miller v. Securepak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The district court did not err in dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See 42 [507]*507U.S.C. § 1983; West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48, 108 S.Ct. 2250, 101 L.Ed.2d 40 (1988).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 F. App'x 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-securepak-ca9-2008.