Miller v. Schneider

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Schneider

1 A.D.2d 896, 150 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 896 (Miller v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Schneider, 1 A.D.2d 896, 150 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Action on behalf of the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by his father for medical expenses and loss of services and to recover damages for the father’s personal injuries. At the close of the plaintiffs’ ease, the causes of action on behalf of the infant and his father, incidental thereto, were severed and, with the court’s consent, settled. The court thereupon dismissed the father’s cause of action for his personal injuries, and the appeal is from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial on the ground that questions of fact were presented which should have been submitted to the jury for determination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action on behalf of the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries and by his father for medical expenses and loss of services and to recover damages for the father’s personal injuries. At the close of the plaintiffs’ ease, the causes of action on behalf of the infant and his father, incidental thereto, were severed and, with the court’s consent, settled. The court thereupon dismissed the father’s cause of action for his personal injuries, and the appeal is from the judgment entered thereon. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Hallinan, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial on the ground that questions of fact were presented which should have been submitted to the jury for determination.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 896, 150 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-schneider-nyappdiv-1956.