Miller v. Scagnelli
This text of 487 A.2d 641 (Miller v. Scagnelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
Defendants appeal from the denial of their motion for relief (M.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6)) from an order requiring that they pay the costs of a survey performed in connection with litigation concerning a right of way. Rule 60(b)(6) requires a showing of injustice in the original order and the ruling of the Superior Court is reviewable only for an abuse of discretion. See Merrill v. Merrill, 449 A.2d 1120, 1125 (Me.1982). We find no abuse of discretion on the record before us.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
487 A.2d 641, 1985 Me. LEXIS 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-scagnelli-me-1985.