Miller v. Sappington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Miller v. Sappington

1 White & W. 70

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 19, 1881·No. No. 1644, Op. Book No. 3, p. 549·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 17 6. Appeal bond from justice's court. The condition of the bond was, “ that the said Miller & Hendricks' shall prosecute their said appeal to effect, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against them in said suit.” Held, to be in substantial compliance with the statute. [Gen. Laws 1876, p. 163, sec. 21; R. S. art. 1639; Gen. Laws 18th Leg. p. 91; Reid v. Fernandez, 52 Tex. 379.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 17 6. Appeal bond from justice's court. The condition of the bond was, “ that the said Miller & Hendricks' shall prosecute their said appeal to effect, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against them in said suit.” Held, to be in substantial compliance with the statute. [Gen. Laws 1876, p. 163, sec. 21; R. S. art. 1639; Gen. Laws 18th Leg. p. 91; Reid v. Fernandez, 52 Tex. 379.]

Reversed and remanded.

Miller v. Sappington, 1 White & W. 70 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

1 White & W. 70 (Miller v. Sappington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related