Miller v. Sappington

Court of Appeals of Texas

Miller v. Sappington

1 White & W. 70

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 19, 1881

DocketNo. 1644, Op. Book No. 3, p. 549

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 70 (Miller v. Sappington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Sappington, 1 White & W. 70 (Tex. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 17 6. Appeal bond from justice's court. The condition of the bond was, “ that the said Miller & Hendricks' shall prosecute their said appeal to effect, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against them in said suit.” Held, to be in substantial compliance with the statute. [Gen. Laws 1876, p. 163, sec. 21; R. S. art. 1639; Gen. Laws 18th Leg. p. 91; Reid v. Fernandez, 52 Tex. 379.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 17 6. Appeal bond from justice's court. The condition of the bond was, “ that the said Miller & Hendricks' shall prosecute their said appeal to effect, and shall pay and satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against them in said suit.” Held, to be in substantial compliance with the statute. [Gen. Laws 1876, p. 163, sec. 21; R. S. art. 1639; Gen. Laws 18th Leg. p. 91; Reid v. Fernandez, 52 Tex. 379.]

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-sappington-texapp-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack