Miller v. Russi

225 A.D.2d 368, 639 N.Y.2d 688, 639 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2211
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 12, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 225 A.D.2d 368 (Miller v. Russi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Russi, 225 A.D.2d 368, 639 N.Y.2d 688, 639 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[369]*369Respondent’s determination that petitioner violated a condition of his parole by resisting arrest is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [viii]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the police had probable cause to believe that petitioner had committed a crime when they apprehended him, such that the arrest was lawful (People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181, 185). We have reviewed petitioner’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Wallach, J. P., Ross, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Osman v. Stanford
137 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Peck v. Evans
118 A.D.3d 1086 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 368, 639 N.Y.2d 688, 639 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-russi-nyappdiv-1996.