Miller v. Russi
225 A.D.2d 368, 639 N.Y.2d 688, 639 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2211
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[369] Respondent’s determination that petitioner violated a condition of his parole by resisting arrest is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f] [viii]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the police had probable cause to believe that petitioner had committed a crime when they apprehended him, such that the arrest was lawful (People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181, 185). We have reviewed petitioner’s other claims and find them to be without merit. Concur — Wallach, J. P., Ross, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Russi, 225 A.D.2d 368, 639 N.Y.2d 688, 639 N.Y.S.2d 688, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 368 (Miller v. Russi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Osman v. Stanford
137 A.D.3d 628 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Peck v. Evans
118 A.D.3d 1086 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)