Miller v. RKO Proctor Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. RKO Proctor Corp.

256 A.D. 908, 10 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5355

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1939·Published

Opinion

—While we hold the complaint to be sufficient we do not mean to indicate that the plaintiffs will be entitled to all of the relief demanded. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order, with notice of entry thereof, upon payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—While we hold the complaint to be sufficient we do not mean to indicate that the plaintiffs will be entitled to all of the relief demanded. Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within twenty days after service of a copy of the order, with notice of entry thereof, upon payment of said costs. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.

Miller v. RKO Proctor Corp., 256 A.D. 908, 10 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

256 A.D. 908 (Miller v. RKO Proctor Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.