Miller v. Reinhart
497 So. 2d 1332, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10846
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1986·No. No. 4-86-1575·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the trial court’s order disqualifying counsel for petitioners on the authority of Ray v. Stuckey, 491 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) and Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We grant the petition because we find no evi-dentiary support for respondents’ claim that counsel was an indispensable witness who would have to be called by petitioners or that counsel would offer testimony adverse to petitioners’ case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Reinhart, 497 So. 2d 1332, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10846 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
497 So. 2d 1332 (Miller v. Reinhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murphey v. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach, Inc.
630 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. Bender
497 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)