Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Miller v. Reinhart

Miller v. Reinhart

497 So. 2d 1332, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10846
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 26, 1986
DocketNo. 4-86-1575
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 497 So. 2d 1332 (Miller v. Reinhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Reinhart, 497 So. 2d 1332, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10846 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and quash the trial court’s order disqualifying counsel for petitioners on the authority of Ray v. Stuckey, 491 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) and Cazares v. Church of Scientology of California, Inc., 429 So.2d 348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). We grant the petition because we find no evi-dentiary support for respondents’ claim that counsel was an indispensable witness who would have to be called by petitioners or that counsel would offer testimony adverse to petitioners’ case.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphey v. Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach, Inc.
630 So. 2d 591 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY v. Bender
497 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
497 So. 2d 1332, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2487, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-reinhart-fladistctapp-1986.