Miller v. Reed, Fears & Miller, Inc.

Third Circuit

Miller v. Reed, Fears & Miller, Inc.

5 F.2d 1018, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2844

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 6, 1925

DocketNo. 3288

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.2d 1018 (Miller v. Reed, Fears & Miller, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Reed, Fears & Miller, Inc., 5 F.2d 1018, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2844 (3d Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case involves two questions, one of fact whether there was an agreement of sufficient consideration and properly limited in time and locality between these parties for one party to keep out of business. We agree with the court’s finding of fact that there was such an agreement and that it was legally enforceable. The second question is as to the construction and effect to be given such agreement. We agree with the court’s holding in that regard. As no principles of law or matters of concern beyond this particular agreement are here involved, and as the entire matter has been fully and satisfactorily discussed in the lower court’s opinion (2 F.[2d] 280), we now restrict ourselves to stating the decree below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case involves two questions, one of fact whether there was an agreement of sufficient consideration and properly limited in time and locality between these parties for one party to keep out of business. We agree with the court’s finding of fact that there was such an agreement and that it was legally enforceable. The second question is as to the construction and effect to be given such agreement. We agree with the court’s holding in that regard. As no principles of law or matters of concern beyond this particular agreement are here involved, and as the entire matter has been fully and satisfactorily discussed in the lower court’s opinion (2 F.[2d] 280), we now restrict ourselves to stating the decree below is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 F.2d 1018, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-reed-fears-miller-inc-ca3-1925.