Miller v. Rasch

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Miller v. Rasch

3 Rob. 410

DecidedJanuary 15, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Rob. 410 (Miller v. Rasch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Rasch, 3 Rob. 410 (La. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

Garland, J.

The defendant, being sued on his promissory note, answered that he had obtained a respite ; and that all proceedings against his person and property were arrested by the judgment or order granting it. The exception was sustained, and the suit dismissed. The question seems to us settled, by the opinion given in the case of Rasch v. His Creditors, which has been just decided.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garland, J.

The defendant, being sued on his promissory note, answered that he had obtained a respite ; and that all proceedings against his person and property were arrested by the judgment or order granting it. The exception was sustained, and the suit dismissed. The question seems to us settled, by the opinion given in the case of Rasch v. His Creditors, which has been just decided.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Rob. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-rasch-la-1843.