Miller v. Proprietary

1 Md. 543
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 15, 1774·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In the case of Bewdley, 1 P. Wms. 223. also cited in Stra. 102. a practice was held to prevail against an act of Parliament.

In 1 Bac. Abr. 194. it is said, that a conviction before Justices, on proof or confession, may be reversed without a writ of error. Perhaps this case may be cited on the other side ; but the meaning of it is no more than this: that in these summary proceedings there is no occasion for a writ of error ; but it by no means proves the case erroneous, for there is scarce any other way to convict persons but by proof or confession; 2 Jones, 167. and it is evident that all convictions before Justices of the Peace, in a summary way, are on proof or on confession.

The Provincial Court reversed the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Proprietary, 1 Md. 543 (Md. 1774).

1 Md. 543 (Miller v. Proprietary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Douglass v. Riggin
90 A. 1000 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1914)
Oberheim v. Reeside
81 A. 590 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1911)
South Baltimore Harbor & Improvement Co. v. Smith
37 A. 27 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1897)
Carsnell v. Cate
1 Balt. C. Rep. 408 (Baltimore City Circuit Court, 1894)