Miller v. Prescott

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Miller v. Prescott

146 N.W. 1124, 157 Wis. 264, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 194

DecidedMay 1, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 146 N.W. 1124 (Miller v. Prescott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Prescott, 146 N.W. 1124, 157 Wis. 264, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 194 (Wis. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

KeRwiN, J.

The main question presented upon this appeal is whether the verdict is supported by the evidence. Under the established rule of this court, if there is any credible evidence to support the verdict it cannot be disturbed.

We do not regard the finding of the jury upon the first question of the special verdict respecting the good faith of the defendant necessary to support the judgment, therefore do not determine whether such finding is supported by the evidence or not.

All other findings of the special verdict are supported by the evidence, therefore the judgment must be affirmed.

Complaint is made by counsel for appellant of remarks made by the judge below upon the trial. We find no prejudicial error in this regard.

By the Oowrt. — The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI