Miller v. Poole

Fourth Circuit

Miller v. Poole

628 F. App'x 191

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2016·No. No. 15-7207·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Henry Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Poole, No. 1:15-cv-00057-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 28, 2015). The motions to dismiss defendants’ informal response brief, for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Henry Miller appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Miller v. Poole, No. 1:15-cv-00057-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 28, 2015). The motions to dismiss defendants’ informal response brief, for appointment of counsel and for injunctive relief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Miller v. Poole, 628 F. App'x 191 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

628 F. App'x 191 (Miller v. Poole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related