Miller v. Pierce

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7209

JAMES EDWARD MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MIKE PIERCE; DAVID PENDRY; BUTCH HOLLAND; TIM CHEEK; RONNIE PRICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:99-cv-00050)

Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: June 15, 2007

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Mason Thomas, PATRICK, HARPER & DIXON, Hickory, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Edward Miller appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint upon remand

from this court. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Miller v. Pierce, No. 5:99-cv-00050 (W.D.N.C.

June 28, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -