Miller v. Pesto

1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 21
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County·Decided March 15, 1902·No. No. 293·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Hart, P. J.

And now April 14, 1902, this case having been heard and it appearing from the record that the defendant was not served {personally nor that such service was made as required by law, the specification of error is sustained and proceeding and judgment reversed.

Reported by Mortimer C. Rhone, Esq.,

Williamsport, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Pesto, 1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 21 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1902).

1 Pa. Just. L. Rep. 21 (Miller v. Pesto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.