Miller v. Pendleton

Virginia Chancery Court

Miller v. Pendleton

4 Va. 436

DecidedJune 15, 1809

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Va. 436 (Miller v. Pendleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Virginia Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Pendleton, 4 Va. 436 (Va. Super. Ct. 1809).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Chancellor.

The plaintiffs are entitled to no pi-eferences among the creditors of the intestate, as the deed was not recorded in the manner prescribed by law ; but as the plaintiffs have paid, or are bound to pay, Gray's judgment, they must be allowed to stand in Gray’s place, and take that proportion of the assets to which he would be entitled, if he was now a creditor of the intestate ; and so it was decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Chancellor.

The plaintiffs are entitled to no pi-eferences among the creditors of the intestate, as the deed was not recorded in the manner prescribed by law ; but as the plaintiffs have paid, or are bound to pay, Gray's judgment, they must be allowed to stand in Gray’s place, and take that proportion of the assets to which he would be entitled, if he was now a creditor of the intestate ; and so it was decreed accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Va. 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-pendleton-vachanct-1809.