Miller v. Park Inn Home for Adults

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miller v. Park Inn Home for Adults

299 A.D.2d 465, 749 N.Y.S.2d 897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.D.2d 465 (Miller v. Park Inn Home for Adults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Park Inn Home for Adults, 299 A.D.2d 465, 749 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Park Inn Home for Adults appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated June 12, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Mette P. Larsen separately ap[466]*466peals from so much of the same order as denied her separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Smith, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant Park Inn Home for Adults appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated June 12, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and the defendant Mette P. Larsen separately ap[466]*466peals from so much of the same order as denied her separate motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Smith, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.D.2d 465, 749 N.Y.S.2d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-park-inn-home-for-adults-nyappdiv-2002.