Miller v. Palmer

Wyoming Supreme Court

Miller v. Palmer

181 P. 427, 26 Wyo. 191, 1919 Wyo. LEXIS 12

CourtWyoming Supreme Court

DecidedJune 3, 1919

DocketNo. 901

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 181 P. 427 (Miller v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Palmer, 181 P. 427, 26 Wyo. 191, 1919 Wyo. LEXIS 12 (Wyo. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Potter, Justice.

This case involves the same questions and upon the same facts that are considered in Miller, as Receiver, v. Amoretti, this day decided. The two cases were submitted together. It is alleged that Mrs. Palmer, the defendant, is the owner of twelve and one-half shares of the stock of the Farmers’ State Bank of Bridger, Montana, and it is sought to recover, in this suit by the receiver of said bank, her super-added liability, under the Montana statute. A demurrer to the petition, as amended, was sustained, and upon the plaintiff refusing to further plead, judgment was rendered for the defendant. The case being here on error, the judgment is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case aforesaid of Miller v. Amoretti.

Affirmed.

Beard, C. J., concurs. Biydenburgh, J., being ill, did not participate in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Potter, Justice.

This case involves the same questions and upon the same facts that are considered in Miller, as Receiver, v. Amoretti, this day decided. The two cases were submitted together. It is alleged that Mrs. Palmer, the defendant, is the owner of twelve and one-half shares of the stock of the Farmers’ State Bank of Bridger, Montana, and it is sought to recover, in this suit by the receiver of said bank, her super-added liability, under the Montana statute. A demurrer to the petition, as amended, was sustained, and upon the plaintiff refusing to further plead, judgment was rendered for the defendant. The case being here on error, the judgment is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion in the case aforesaid of Miller v. Amoretti.

Affirmed.

Beard, C. J., concurs. Biydenburgh, J., being ill, did not participate in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 P. 427, 26 Wyo. 191, 1919 Wyo. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-palmer-wyo-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack