Miller v. Page

1968 OK CR 10, 437 P.2d 278
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 17, 1968
DocketNo. A-14532
StatusPublished

This text of 1968 OK CR 10 (Miller v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Page, 1968 OK CR 10, 437 P.2d 278 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

NIX, Presiding Judge:

This is an original proceedings in which-the petitioner James B. Miller, seeks a writ of habeas corpus to compel the prison: authorities to give him credit on his prison sentence for the time spent while on bail. Petitioner relies on the authority of certain-federal court cases: United States ex rel. Binion v. O’Brien, 273 F.2d 495 (C.C.A. 3rd) ; and United States ex rel. Binion v. United States Marshall for District of Nev., 188 F.Supp. 905 (D.C.Nev.).

Petitioner has misunderstood the-rules of law pronounced in said cases, as they are not authority for the proposition that time on bail is creditable, even under federal rules, on a sentence of imprisonment.

8 C.J.S., Baii, § 31, states: One on bail, while continuing to be subject to the jurisdiction of the court in which his causé-is pending, is in the custody of his sureties- and is not in the custody of state authorities in any sense which would entitle him to> credit for such time on his prison sentence,. [279]*279and it is immaterial whether such time on ‘bail was before or after conviction.

Therefore, it is the opinion of this Court that there is no merit to this cause, and the .relief prayed for is denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1968 OK CR 10, 437 P.2d 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-page-oklacrimapp-1968.