Miller v. Ostrowsky

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Miller v. Ostrowsky

204 A.2d 325, 236 Md. 628, 1964 Md. LEXIS 943

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedNovember 9, 1964

DocketNo. 36

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.2d 325 (Miller v. Ostrowsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Ostrowsky, 204 A.2d 325, 236 Md. 628, 1964 Md. LEXIS 943 (Md. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this suit upon an alleged oral agreement for the sale of the fixtures and good will of a retail store, the Chancellor below found that the complainants failed to prove the oral contract, and failed to establish fraud or the basis for an estoppel. For the reasons set out in the exhaustive opinion of the Chancellor, we must agree. At least, we cannot hold that his findings of fact were clearly erroneous. We do not reach the legal questions argued in the briefs.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this suit upon an alleged oral agreement for the sale of the fixtures and good will of a retail store, the Chancellor below found that the complainants failed to prove the oral contract, and failed to establish fraud or the basis for an estoppel. For the reasons set out in the exhaustive opinion of the Chancellor, we must agree. At least, we cannot hold that his findings of fact were clearly erroneous. We do not reach the legal questions argued in the briefs.

Decree affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.2d 325, 236 Md. 628, 1964 Md. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-ostrowsky-md-1964.